4 thoughts on “Super horrible scientific paradox, will our world be virtual?”
Virgil
Can we confirm and distinguish with these is the real world? Will the feedback mechanism of our brain be deceived? You know, many times, we will also treat dreams as real things, but that is just a brain deception.
based on some of the actual situation above, scientists have proposed a horrible thought experiment : The brain in the cylinder! The people need to pay attention. Thought experiments are not scientific conjectures and scientific inferences. There is no need to having axiom mathematical proof. This is just our fantasies about this world. The nature is the same.
I assuming that science is developed enough, a person is taken away by a scientist without awareness, and the scientist puts this brain alone in a nutrition that can guarantee it to survive. Inside the liquid container. At this time, scientists connect various signal circuits to the brain. These circuits can send a variety of perception signals to the brain. These signals can simulate our perception of this world 100%.
It all our senses at this time, such as smell, taste, and touch are feedback from machine signals, not real. These signals are controlled by a central computer, and scientists can program all my senses in this computer. Your cognition, your memory, your social relationship, everything you can feedback to you through this computer. The problems at this time, our brain cannot identify the sources of these signals, and the brain can only process and feedback these signals. In other words, this brain cannot distinguish whether it is in a real world or in a nutritional liquid container. From the perspective of the brain, it is still the same as before. It does not know that it is actually in a computer programming world, no longer in the real world.
This is the brain thought experiment in the famous tank. This experiment is very scary for humans, because it is easy to associate with our real world: if our world is a brain in the tank, then we cannot distinguish it. The most abominable thing is that if you refute this statement, the person who believes that this statement will use a sentence that is very dependent on but very reasonable to refute you: everything you say now, everything you refute is actually actually what you say is actually what you say now is actually what you say now is actually what you say is actually what you say now is actually what you say now is actually what you say. Computer programming controls you. This is equivalent to a logical knot, and it can't be solved.
This scientists have doubts about the world. Even Hawking said similar words during his lifetime: in the issue of distinguishing between dreams and reality, we human beings have no power to do.
In the field of brain science, we are basically in the stone era. We only know that the brain is a complex structure composed of hundreds of billions of neurons, and we know what behaviors are managed in each region. To understand the entire brain thoroughly, this may be more difficult than understanding the entire universe. In order to further study the brain, many countries and organizations have ambitious ambitions. In 2009, scientists at Oxford University tried to use a computer to simulate a device that is not as complicated than the human brain. It plans to achieve results within 10 years. To this end, the European Union also invested more than 1 billion euros, which was the "Human Brain Plan (HBP)", which was famous at that time. But 10 years have passed. Not to mention any results, scientists have not even made this device.
With the advancement of human science and the widening of the cognitive boundary, the deeper the problem of the brain in the cylinder, the more horrible it is. In April 2019, the brain in a low -end version of the tank appeared. Scientists separated the brain of a small pig that had been killed for 4 hours and put it on an interior of a nutritional device called "Mos". The pig brain in the nutrient solution did not die, and some micro -tissues and cells have maintained activity for more than 6 hours. This device proves that humans can delay the death of the brain after their body death. Of course, this device does not fully prove that the brain in the tank can exist, because scientists have not detected the brain's brain signal. If the Electric Electrical Signal exists, it proves that the brain in the cylinder is feasible.
The development of science is this step -by -step breakthrough. If we develop for hundreds of years, maybe one day we can really change the pig's brain? Will the brain in the tank change from ideological experiments to reality. Faced with these problems, we can't think much, but we don't think more, don't think more, even more dare to think, because the more horrible the more horrible. We cannot accept that we are just a group of walking code!
Our world cannot be virtual, because all the substances in our world are real. If it is a world virtual, then this is not in line with the law of science.
I don't think it is, because our world exists in time dimension, and the time will only go forward, and we will never flow back. What we see can only be everything that happens in the future. It is said that our world is not virtual, but the real existence
This theory was first proposed in 1981, but because our science and technology are still very limited until now, it is impossible to explain whether this theory is really a paradox.
Can we confirm and distinguish with these is the real world? Will the feedback mechanism of our brain be deceived? You know, many times, we will also treat dreams as real things, but that is just a brain deception.
based on some of the actual situation above, scientists have proposed a horrible
thought experiment
: The brain in the cylinder!
The people need to pay attention. Thought experiments are not scientific conjectures and scientific inferences. There is no need to having axiom mathematical proof. This is just our fantasies about this world. The nature is the same.
I assuming that science is developed enough, a person is taken away by a scientist without awareness, and the scientist puts this brain alone in a nutrition that can guarantee it to survive. Inside the liquid container. At this time, scientists connect various signal circuits to the brain. These circuits can send a variety of perception signals to the brain. These signals can simulate our perception of this world 100%.
It all our senses at this time, such as smell, taste, and touch are feedback from machine signals, not real. These signals are controlled by a central computer, and scientists can program all my senses in this computer. Your cognition, your memory, your social relationship, everything you can feedback to you through this computer.
The problems at this time, our brain cannot identify the sources of these signals, and the brain can only process and feedback these signals. In other words, this brain cannot distinguish whether it is in a real world or in a nutritional liquid container. From the perspective of the brain, it is still the same as before. It does not know that it is actually in a computer programming world, no longer in the real world.
This is the brain thought experiment in the famous tank. This experiment is very scary for humans, because it is easy to associate with our real world: if our world is a brain in the tank, then we cannot distinguish it.
The most abominable thing is that if you refute this statement, the person who believes that this statement will use a sentence that is very dependent on but very reasonable to refute you: everything you say now, everything you refute is actually actually what you say is actually what you say now is actually what you say now is actually what you say is actually what you say now is actually what you say now is actually what you say. Computer programming controls you. This is equivalent to a logical knot, and it can't be solved.
This scientists have doubts about the world. Even Hawking said similar words during his lifetime: in the issue of distinguishing between dreams and reality, we human beings have no power to do.
In the field of brain science, we are basically in the stone era. We only know that the brain is a complex structure composed of hundreds of billions of neurons, and we know what behaviors are managed in each region. To understand the entire brain thoroughly, this may be more difficult than understanding the entire universe.
In order to further study the brain, many countries and organizations have ambitious ambitions. In 2009, scientists at Oxford University tried to use a computer to simulate a device that is not as complicated than the human brain. It plans to achieve results within 10 years. To this end, the European Union also invested more than 1 billion euros, which was the "Human Brain Plan (HBP)", which was famous at that time. But 10 years have passed. Not to mention any results, scientists have not even made this device.
With the advancement of human science and the widening of the cognitive boundary, the deeper the problem of the brain in the cylinder, the more horrible it is. In April 2019, the brain in a low -end version of the tank appeared. Scientists separated the brain of a small pig that had been killed for 4 hours and put it on an interior of a nutritional device called "Mos". The pig brain in the nutrient solution did not die, and some micro -tissues and cells have maintained activity for more than 6 hours.
This device proves that humans can delay the death of the brain after their body death. Of course, this device does not fully prove that the brain in the tank can exist, because scientists have not detected the brain's brain signal. If the Electric Electrical Signal exists, it proves that the brain in the cylinder is feasible.
The development of science is this step -by -step breakthrough. If we develop for hundreds of years, maybe one day we can really change the pig's brain? Will the brain in the tank change from ideological experiments to reality.
Faced with these problems, we can't think much, but we don't think more, don't think more, even more dare to think, because the more horrible the more horrible. We cannot accept that we are just a group of walking code!
Our world cannot be virtual, because all the substances in our world are real. If it is a world virtual, then this is not in line with the law of science.
I don't think it is, because our world exists in time dimension, and the time will only go forward, and we will never flow back. What we see can only be everything that happens in the future. It is said that our world is not virtual, but the real existence
This theory was first proposed in 1981, but because our science and technology are still very limited until now, it is impossible to explain whether this theory is really a paradox.